Sexy Stars: Rita Ora wears lingerie and Priyanka Chopra is a stunner in navy blue

Aol.com Editors

Dec 13th 2016 6:26PM

She wore what?!

Stars got racy in their respective red carpet looks this week -- and some more than others.

It seems like Rita Ora forgot to look in the mirror before leaving home. The singer hit the red carpet wearing ... lingerie. Nonetheless, she rocked it with no shame.

"Quantico" star Priyanka Chopra was a stunner in blue at a UNICEF event. The actress paired the figure-hugging dress with a sexy red lip.

Of course, Ashley Graham oozed sex appeal at a Sport's Illustrated event, wearing a sequined pink-and-black frock. The model flashed major cleavage in the tight number.

Check out other sexy looks from this week in the slideshow below:

9 PHOTOS

Sexy Stars: Week of December 12

See Gallery

Rita Ora took her bedroom wear to the red carpet in a daring outfit -- where do we even begin looking?!

(Photo: Getty)

Bombshell alert! Ashley Graham flashed major cleavage in a sequined pink-and-black dress at a Sport's Illustrated event.

(Photo: Getty)

Eva Longoria proved you can't go wrong in black as she attended a gala during the Dubai International Film Festival. The actress flaunted a hint of cleavage in an off-the-shoulder gown with a show-stopping train.

(Photo: Getty)

Brunette babe! Actress Kate Beckinsale rocked an all-black jumpsuit while promoting her new movie.

(Photo: Getty)

Alexa Chung got into the holiday spirit in this stunning gold gown for a dinner supporting Women's Global Movement For Gender Equality, 'HeForShe.'

(Photo: Getty)

Helen Mirren is a true ageless beauty! The actress wore an all-blue outfit at the premiere of Collateral Beauty in New York City.

(Photo: Getty)

Actress Priyanka Chopra is a true stunner! The "Quantico" star can even make a simple navy dress look good.

(Photo: Getty)

TOKYO, JAPAN - DECEMBER 13: Milla Jovovich attends the world premiere of 'Resident Evil: The Final Chapter' at the Roppongi Hills on December 13, 2016 in Tokyo, Japan. (Photo by Jun Sato/WireImage)

Up Next

See Gallery

Discover More Like This

of

SEE ALL

BACK TO SLIDE

SHOW CAPTION +

HIDE CAPTION â€"

Read Full Story"

| Sexy | Stars: | Rita | wears | lingerie | Priyanka | Chopra | stunner | navy | blue | Aol | Editors< | p> Dec | 13th | 2016 | 6:26PM< | p> < | div> < | div> < | div> She | wore | what | p> Stars | racy | their | respective | carpet | looks | this | week | some | more | than | others | p> It | seems | like | forgot | look | mirror | before | leaving | home | singer | wearing | Nonetheless | rocked | with | shame | p> Quantico | star | UNICEF | event | actress | paired | figure | hugging | dress | sexy | p> Of | course | Ashley | Graham | oozed | appeal | Sports | Illustrated | sequined | pink | black | frock | model | flashed | major | cleavage | tight | number | p> Check | other | from | slideshow | below:< | p> 9< | span> | PHOTOS< | span>< | p> Sexy | Week | December | p> See | Gallery< | div> Rita | took | bedroom | wear | ng outfit | where | even | begin | looking | p> (Photo: | Getty)< | div> Bombshell | alert! | div> Eva | Longoria | proved | cant | wrong | attended | gala | during | Dubai | International | Film | Festival | flaunted | hint | an off | shoulder | gown | show | stopping | train | div> Brunette | babe! | Actress | Kate | Beckinsale | rocked an | jumpsuit | while | promoting | movie | div> Alexa | Chung | into | holiday | spirit | stunning | gold | dinner | supporting | Womens | Global | Movement | Gender | Equality | HeForShe | div> Helen | Mirren | true | ageless | beauty! | outfit | premiere | Collateral | Beauty< | York | City | div> Actress | stunner! | Quantico | make | simple | good | div> TOKYO | JAPAN | DECEMBER | Milla | Jovovich | attends | world | Resident | Evil: | Final | Chapter | Roppongi | Hills | Tokyo | Japan | (Photo | Sato | WireImage)< | p> Up | Next< | span> See | div> Discover | More | Like | This< | span> < | div> | button> | button> < | button>< | div> of< | p> SEE | ALL< | p> BACK | SLIDE | div> < | div> SHOW | CAPTION | p> HIDE | â€"< | div> Read | Full | Story< |

Read More

RACIST LINGERIE? Cosmopolitan Criticizes Victoria's Secret

Cosmopolitan writer Helin Jung wrote that Victoria’s Secret has developed racist lingerie for its annual fashion show. Yes, apparently lingerie can be racist:

None of that even sounds nice, but if it does, don’t let yourself be hoodwinked by Victoria’s Secret’s brazen attempt to re-label what is clearly cultural appropriation by turning it into a celebration of “culture.” The brand and its creative leads shamelessly cherry-picked imagery, breaking apart aesthetic references from wherever they wanted and stitching them back together again. They’re telling us it’s worldliness. It’s not, it’s a hack job.

As Emily Zanotti at Heat Street points out, when anyone tries to celebrate culture, people will greet it “with charges of bigotry.”

The first segment called “The Road Ahead” wanted to showcase different cultures around the world, featuring items designed from the people the theme wants to celebrate:

Arpana Rayamajhi, a Nepalese jewelry designer based in New York City, described the theme this way: She said, “The idea is that you’re blending little bits of this and that from all cultures around the world.” Rayamajhi created much of the handmade jewelry for the segment; the jewelry included silk threads turned into tassels, coins from Nepal, and beads â€" “a huge part of my culture.”

For some reason, Jung cannot stand this. She also found it disturbing that the company used “strips of culture” in its designs, “inspired by the likes of Peruvian, Mexican, and Chinese design.” Jung continued:

Collection creative director Sophia Neophitou described the hand-painted fabrics used in this segment by saying, “It’s meant to be this naive, homespun … but this is so luxurious.”

It doesn’t get much more patronizing than that, does it? The original version is made by simple people (“naive”) who make crafts (“homespun”), and it’s Victoria’s Secret that can elevate the primitive to something more “luxurious.” What would be the point of the corporation’s untold resources and unparalleled knowledge of world cultures if it couldn’t do that?

Nope. To Jung, all of this is another way for the Western world to show hatred towards other cultures. It is another way for the Western world to profit off of others.

Look, social justice warriors, you can’t have it both ways. You cannot complain about a lack of diversity or that others do not care about other cultures and then bitch when a company does exactly that:

With its positive, pre-emptive spin about globalization and multi-culturalism, Victoria’s Secret seems to have anticipated my response. The brand is leading with the notion that we’re all members of the human race, therefore everything belongs to everyone. But this is exceptional disingenuousness coming from a brand that once put Karlie Kloss in a Native American war bonnet and leopard print underwear. The fact is that even as the world gets more connected, a sexist, patriarchal, mostly white corporation continues to take what it wants for its own gain. Its exploitation of these cultural references is meant to lead directly to profits. And I’m not buying it.

So where does it stop? It’s a no win situation when it comes to these social justice warriors who want to find fault in everything they see. The warriors complain about a lack of diversity, but when a company decides to make diversity a theme the warriors claim racism.

I admit I had a hard time writing this post because I could hardly find the words to express the weirdness in Jung’s train of thought.

But will the warriors ever learn to take it easy and stop taking everything so seriously?

[embedded content]

"

| RACIST | LINGERIE? | Cosmopolitan | Criticizes | Victorias | Secret | Cosmopolitan< | writer | Helin | Jung | wrote | that | Victoria’s | developed | racist | lingerie | annual | fashion | show | apparently | racist< | a>:< | p> None | even | sounds | nice | does | don’t | yourself | hoodwinked | Secret’s | brazen | attempt | label | what | clearly | cultural | appropriation | turning | into | celebration | “culture | brand | creative | leads | shamelessly | cherry | picked | imagery | breaking | apart | aesthetic | references | from | wherever | they | wanted | stitching | them | back | together | again | They’re | telling | it’s | worldliness | It’s | hack | p> < | blockquote> As | Emily | Zanotti | Heat | Street< | points | when | anyone | tries | celebrate | culture | people | will | greet | “with | charges | bigotry | ”< | p> The | first | segment | called | “The | Road | Ahead” | showcase | different | cultures | around | world | featuring | items | designed | theme | wants | celebrate:< | p> Arpana | Rayamajhi | Nepalese | jewelry | designer | based | York | City | described | this | way: | said | idea | you’re | blending | little | bits | created | much | handmade | segment; | included | silk | threads | turned | tassels | coins | Nepal | beads | “a | huge | part | blockquote> For | some | reason | cannot | stand | also | found< | disturbing | company | used | “strips | culture” | designs | “inspired | likes | Peruvian | Mexican | Chinese | design | continued:< | p> Collection | director | Sophia | Neophitou | hand | painted | fabrics | saying | “It’s | meant | naive | homespun | luxurious | p> It | doesn’t | more | patronizing | than | original | version | made | simple | (“naive”) | make | crafts | (“homespun”) | elevate | primitive | something | “luxurious | What | would | point | corporation’s | untold | resources | unparalleled | knowledge | couldn’t | p> Nope | another | Western | hatred | towards | other | profit | others | blockquote> Look | social | justice | warriors | can’t | have | both | ways | complain | about | lack | diversity | care | then | bitch | exactly | that< | p> With | positive | emptive | spin | globalization | multi | culturalism | seems | anticipated | response | leading | with | notion | we’re | members | human | race | therefore | everything | belongs | everyone | exceptional | disingenuousness | coming | once | Karlie | Kloss | Native | American | bonnet | leopard | print | underwear | fact | gets | connected | sexist | patriarchal | mostly | white | corporation | continues | take | gain | exploitation | these | lead | directly | profits | I’m | buying | blockquote> So | where | stop | situation | comes | want | find | fault | decides | claim | racism | p> I | admit | hard | time | writing | post | because | could | hardly | words | express | weirdness | Jung’s | train | thought | p> But | ever | learn | easy | taking | seriously | p> [embedded | content]< | p> |

Read More

Victoria's Secret Accused of Designing 'Racist Lingerie'

Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images for Victoria's Secret

by Jerome Hudson2 Dec 20160

2 Dec, 20162 Dec, 2016

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Womenswear brand Victoria’s Secret has been accused of cultural appropriation and of designing “racist” lingerie by a lifestyle editor at Cosmopolitan magazine.

In an article, Helin Jung, executive lifestyle editor at the outlet, criticized what she called the “sexist, patriarchal, mostly white corporation” for its “brazen” perpetuation of “what is clearly cultural appropriation.”

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Jung begins her critique by describing the Victoria’s Secret annual fashion show, which kicked off Wednesday in Paris.

“Models dressed in costumes fit for segments called ‘Dark Angel,’ ‘Secret Angel,’ and ‘Bright Night Angels’ stomped down the runway at the Grand Palais, showing off the sculpted results of their life’s work and ‘naturally’ enhanced hair,” Jung wrote.

After detailing the various designers, models, and entertainers showcased at the “multimillion-dollar televised panty parade,” Jung ominously warns, “But look closer and you’ll see that the golden glitter path is paved with unfortunate intentions.”

Jung’s biggest point of contention, apparently, is that while Victoria’s Secret’s appears to celebrate the world’s multicultural beauty through design and fashion, it is actually engaging in the “exploitation of these cultural references.”

“[D]on’t let yourself be hoodwinked by Victoria’s Secret’s brazen attempt to relabel what is clearly cultural appropriation by turning it into a celebration of ‘culture,'” Jung wrote. “The brand and its creative leads shamelessly cherry-picked imagery, breaking apart aesthetic references from wherever they wanted and stitching them back together again. They’re telling us it’s worldliness. It’s not; it’s a hack job.”

Jung rails against Chinese cultural appropriation, writing that “the emblems that stood out most were the ones that came from Asia â€" specifically China.”

But Jung also acknowledges that Nepalese  jewelry designer Arpana Rayamajhi created most of the work for the segment.

Jung firmly rejects Victoria’s Secret for its seemingly sincere attempt at appreciating the world’s cultures.

“With its positive, pre-emptive spin about globalization and multiculturalism, Victoria’s Secret seems to have anticipated my response,” Jung wrote. “The brand is leading with the notion that we’re all members of the human race, therefore everything belongs to everyone.”

UPDATE: Cosmopolitan appears to have taken down the article, as the link leads to an error message. The article is still available in an archived link here.

Social media users who noticed the article ripped the fashion website for publishing the piece, which accused Victoria Secret of mass cultural appropriation for profit.

Cosmopolitan is confused by multiculturalism, calls it racist.https://t.co/M1RGSCODFA pic.twitter.com/J6VhkLEPdO

â€" Robot (@_RobotPanda) December 1, 2016

Why did @Cosmopolitan show only white models in article abt #VictoriaSecret being racist & no Black or Asian model?https://t.co/SMCHyMxGep pic.twitter.com/3YQAmTpFpc

â€" Lalo Dagach (@LaloDagach) December 1, 2016

@Cosmopolitan how is dressing up in an outfit that resembles natives considered racist?If anything its flattering.The left has gone crazy

â€" Deplorable Me (@bberube10) December 1, 2016

VS Racist Lingerie? https://t.co/lzyY6jzJhN via @Cosmopolitan @HelinJung is so Stupid. Wrong path. @victoriasecret pay no attention. @LOVE

â€" Illogikus (@Illogikus) December 1, 2016

@Cosmopolitan has officially jumped on the racist train, over what? Ladies lingerie! Wow @Cosmopolitan you must desperate for readers

â€" Richard S Cranford (@cranman1974) December 1, 2016

Other social media users mocked Cosmopolitan for deleting the article.

Awwh man, Cosmopolitan deleted their story about Victoria's Secret and their "racist lingerie."

â€" Dylan Baxter (@ddbaxte) December 2, 2016

😂😂😂 @Cosmopolitan took down their fucktarded "racist lingerie" article. Not that it matters, somebody toss me an archive link to it. pic.twitter.com/VStonP9BxF

â€" CHRISHOLOWICKI =^_^= (@christofilms) December 2, 2016

Follow Jerome Hudson on Twitter @jeromeehudson.

"

| Victorias | Secret | Accused | Designing | Racist | Lingerie | Dimitrios | Kambouris | Getty | Images | Secret< | p> < | div> by< | span> | Jerome | Hudson< | span>2 | 2016< | span>0< | p> 2 | 20162 | div> SIGN | NEWSLETTER< | p> < | div> Womenswear | brand | Victoria’s | been | accused | cultural | appropriation | designing | “racist” | lingerie | lifestyle | editor | Cosmopolitan< | magazine | h2> In | article | Helin | Jung | executive | outlet | criticized | what | called | “sexist | patriarchal | mostly | white | corporation” | “brazen” | perpetuation | “what | clearly | ”< | p> SIGN | div> Jung | begins | critique | describing | the Victoria’s | annual | fashion | show | which | kicked | Wednesday | Paris | p> “Models | dressed | costumes | segments | ‘Dark | Angel | ‘Secret | ‘Bright | Night | Angels’ | stomped | down | runway | Grand | Palais | showing | sculpted | results | their | life’s | work | ‘naturally’ | enhanced | hair | wrote< | p> After | detailing | various | designers | models | entertainers | showcased | “multimillion | dollar | televised | panty | parade | ominously | warns | “But | look | closer | you’ll | that | golden | glitter | path | paved | with | unfortunate | intentions | p> Jung’s | biggest | point | contention | apparently | while | Secret’s | appears | celebrate | world’s | multicultural | beauty | through | design | actually | engaging | “exploitation | these | references | p> “[D]on’t | yourself | hoodwinked | brazen | attempt | relabel | turning | into | celebration | ‘culture | “The | creative | leads | shamelessly | cherry | picked | imagery | breaking | apart | aesthetic | from | wherever | they | wanted | stitching | them | back | together | again | They’re | telling | it’s | worldliness | It’s | not; | hack | p> Jung | rails | against | Chinese | writing< | “the | emblems | stood | most | were | ones | came | Asia | specifically | China | p> But | also | acknowledges | Nepalese |  jewelry | designer | Arpana | Rayamajhi | created | segment | p> Jung | firmly | rejects Victoria’s | seemingly | sincere | appreciating | cultures | p> “With | positive | emptive | spin | about | globalization | multiculturalism | seems | have | anticipated | response | leading | notion | we’re | members | human | race | therefore | everything | belongs | everyone | p> UPDATE: < | strong>Cosmopolitan< | em> appears | taken | link | error | message | still available | archived | link here< | p> Social | media | users | noticed | ripped | website | publishing | piece | Victoria | mass | profit | p> Cosmopolitan | confused | calls | racist | https: | M1RGSCODFA< | twitter | J6VhkLEPdO< | p> â€" | Robot | (@_RobotPanda) | December | blockquote> Why | @Cosmopolitan< | only | VictoriaSecret< | being | & | Black | Asian | model | SMCHyMxGep< | 3YQAmTpFpc< | Lalo | Dagach | (@LaloDagach) | blockquote> @Cosmopolitan< | dressing | outfit | resembles | natives | considered | anything | flattering | left | gone | crazy< | Deplorable | (@bberube10) | blockquote> VS | lzyY6jzJhN< | @HelinJung< | Stupid | Wrong | @victoriasecret< | attention | @LOVE< | Illogikus | (@Illogikus) | officially | jumped | train | over | Ladies | lingerie! | must | desperate | readers< | Richard | Cranford | (@cranman1974) | blockquote> Other | social | mocked Cosmopolitan < | em>for | deleting | p> Awwh | Cosmopolitan | deleted | story | Dylan | Baxter | (@ddbaxte) | blockquote> 😂😂😂 | took | fucktarded | matters | somebody | toss | archive | VStonP9BxF< | CHRISHOLOWICKI | =^_^= | (@christofilms) | blockquote> Follow Jerome | a> on | Twitter @jeromeehudson< | div> |

Read More

Victoria's Secret Accused of Designing 'Racist Lingerie'

Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images for Victoria's Secret

by Jerome Hudson2 Dec 20160

2 Dec, 20162 Dec, 2016

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Womenswear brand Victoria’s Secret has been accused of cultural appropriation and of designing “racist” lingerie by a lifestyle editor at Cosmopolitan magazine.

In an article, Helin Jung, executive lifestyle editor at the outlet, criticized what she called the “sexist, patriarchal, mostly white corporation” for its “brazen” perpetuation of “what is clearly cultural appropriation.”

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Jung begins her critique by describing the Victoria’s Secret annual fashion show, which kicked off Wednesday in Paris.

“Models dressed in costumes fit for segments called ‘Dark Angel,’ ‘Secret Angel,’ and ‘Bright Night Angels’ stomped down the runway at the Grand Palais, showing off the sculpted results of their life’s work and ‘naturally’ enhanced hair,” Jung wrote.

After detailing the various designers, models, and entertainers showcased at the “multimillion-dollar televised panty parade,” Jung ominously warns, “But look closer and you’ll see that the golden glitter path is paved with unfortunate intentions.”

Jung’s biggest point of contention, apparently, is that while Victoria’s Secret’s appears to celebrate the world’s multicultural beauty through design and fashion, it is actually engaging in the “exploitation of these cultural references.”

“[D]on’t let yourself be hoodwinked by Victoria’s Secret’s brazen attempt to relabel what is clearly cultural appropriation by turning it into a celebration of ‘culture,'” Jung wrote. “The brand and its creative leads shamelessly cherry-picked imagery, breaking apart aesthetic references from wherever they wanted and stitching them back together again. They’re telling us it’s worldliness. It’s not; it’s a hack job.”

Jung rails against Chinese cultural appropriation, writing that “the emblems that stood out most were the ones that came from Asia â€" specifically China.”

But Jung also acknowledges that Nepalese  jewelry designer Arpana Rayamajhi created most of the work for the segment.

Jung firmly rejects Victoria’s Secret for its seemingly sincere attempt at appreciating the world’s cultures.

“With its positive, pre-emptive spin about globalization and multiculturalism, Victoria’s Secret seems to have anticipated my response,” Jung wrote. “The brand is leading with the notion that we’re all members of the human race, therefore everything belongs to everyone.”

UPDATE: Cosmopolitan appears to have taken down the article, as the link leads to an error message. The article is still available in an archived link here.

Social media users who noticed the article ripped the fashion website for publishing the piece, which accused Victoria Secret of mass cultural appropriation for profit.

Cosmopolitan is confused by multiculturalism, calls it racist.https://t.co/M1RGSCODFA pic.twitter.com/J6VhkLEPdO

â€" Robot (@_RobotPanda) December 1, 2016

Why did @Cosmopolitan show only white models in article abt #VictoriaSecret being racist & no Black or Asian model?https://t.co/SMCHyMxGep pic.twitter.com/3YQAmTpFpc

â€" Lalo Dagach (@LaloDagach) December 1, 2016

@Cosmopolitan how is dressing up in an outfit that resembles natives considered racist?If anything its flattering.The left has gone crazy

â€" Deplorable Me (@bberube10) December 1, 2016

VS Racist Lingerie? https://t.co/lzyY6jzJhN via @Cosmopolitan @HelinJung is so Stupid. Wrong path. @victoriasecret pay no attention. @LOVE

â€" Illogikus (@Illogikus) December 1, 2016

@Cosmopolitan has officially jumped on the racist train, over what? Ladies lingerie! Wow @Cosmopolitan you must desperate for readers

â€" Richard S Cranford (@cranman1974) December 1, 2016

Other social media users mocked Cosmopolitan for deleting the article.

Awwh man, Cosmopolitan deleted their story about Victoria's Secret and their "racist lingerie."

â€" Dylan Baxter (@ddbaxte) December 2, 2016

😂😂😂 @Cosmopolitan took down their fucktarded "racist lingerie" article. Not that it matters, somebody toss me an archive link to it. pic.twitter.com/VStonP9BxF

â€" CHRISHOLOWICKI =^_^= (@christofilms) December 2, 2016

Follow Jerome Hudson on Twitter @jeromeehudson.

"

| Victorias | Secret | Accused | Designing | Racist | Lingerie | Dimitrios | Kambouris | Getty | Images | Secret< | p> < | div> by< | span> | Jerome | Hudson< | span>2 | 2016< | span>0< | p> 2 | 20162 | div> SIGN | NEWSLETTER< | p> < | div> Womenswear | brand | Victoria’s | been | accused | cultural | appropriation | designing | “racist” | lingerie | lifestyle | editor | Cosmopolitan< | magazine | h2> In | article | Helin | Jung | executive | outlet | criticized | what | called | “sexist | patriarchal | mostly | white | corporation” | “brazen” | perpetuation | “what | clearly | ”< | p> SIGN | div> Jung | begins | critique | describing | the Victoria’s | annual | fashion | show | which | kicked | Wednesday | Paris | p> “Models | dressed | costumes | segments | ‘Dark | Angel | ‘Secret | ‘Bright | Night | Angels’ | stomped | down | runway | Grand | Palais | showing | sculpted | results | their | life’s | work | ‘naturally’ | enhanced | hair | wrote< | p> After | detailing | various | designers | models | entertainers | showcased | “multimillion | dollar | televised | panty | parade | ominously | warns | “But | look | closer | you’ll | that | golden | glitter | path | paved | with | unfortunate | intentions | p> Jung’s | biggest | point | contention | apparently | while | Secret’s | appears | celebrate | world’s | multicultural | beauty | through | design | actually | engaging | “exploitation | these | references | p> “[D]on’t | yourself | hoodwinked | brazen | attempt | relabel | turning | into | celebration | ‘culture | “The | creative | leads | shamelessly | cherry | picked | imagery | breaking | apart | aesthetic | from | wherever | they | wanted | stitching | them | back | together | again | They’re | telling | it’s | worldliness | It’s | not; | hack | p> Jung | rails | against | Chinese | writing< | “the | emblems | stood | most | were | ones | came | Asia | specifically | China | p> But | also | acknowledges | Nepalese |  jewelry | designer | Arpana | Rayamajhi | created | segment | p> Jung | firmly | rejects Victoria’s | seemingly | sincere | appreciating | cultures | p> “With | positive | emptive | spin | about | globalization | multiculturalism | seems | have | anticipated | response | leading | notion | we’re | members | human | race | therefore | everything | belongs | everyone | p> UPDATE: < | strong>Cosmopolitan< | em> appears | taken | link | error | message | still available | archived | link here< | p> Social | media | users | noticed | ripped | website | publishing | piece | Victoria | mass | profit | p> Cosmopolitan | confused | calls | racist | https: | M1RGSCODFA< | twitter | J6VhkLEPdO< | p> â€" | Robot | (@_RobotPanda) | December | blockquote> Why | @Cosmopolitan< | only | VictoriaSecret< | being | & | Black | Asian | model | SMCHyMxGep< | 3YQAmTpFpc< | Lalo | Dagach | (@LaloDagach) | blockquote> @Cosmopolitan< | dressing | outfit | resembles | natives | considered | anything | flattering | left | gone | crazy< | Deplorable | (@bberube10) | blockquote> VS | lzyY6jzJhN< | @HelinJung< | Stupid | Wrong | @victoriasecret< | attention | @LOVE< | Illogikus | (@Illogikus) | officially | jumped | train | over | Ladies | lingerie! | must | desperate | readers< | Richard | Cranford | (@cranman1974) | blockquote> Other | social | mocked Cosmopolitan < | em>for | deleting | p> Awwh | Cosmopolitan | deleted | story | Dylan | Baxter | (@ddbaxte) | blockquote> 😂😂😂 | took | fucktarded | matters | somebody | toss | archive | VStonP9BxF< | CHRISHOLOWICKI | =^_^= | (@christofilms) | blockquote> Follow Jerome | a> on | Twitter @jeromeehudson< | div> |

Read More