Advertisement - Continue Reading Below
Emily Ratajkowski is one of the only Insta-famous models out there who didn't walk in the Victoria's Secret Fashion Show this year, but that didn't stop her from slipping into something sexy over the weekend.
On Sunday, Emily decided to take a steamy lingerie selfie and post it to Instagram. "Night 🌙," she wrote alongside the sizzling image, which featured her in a white lacy bodysuit by Gooseberry Intimates that was sheer all over. Her only other accessory: a pair of layered delicate gold necklaces.
But is there more to this picture than meets the eye? Emily's latest lingerie pic comes after news of photographer Jonathan Leder publishing an entire collection of similar shots in book form. According to the New York Post, the book, Leder/Ratajkowski, features 71 explicit photos of Emily taken at a house in Woodstock, New York. The photos were taken in 2012, before her career took off. "We shot for two nights ... Just her and I," Leder reportedly writes in the foreword to the book, before getting even creepier. "She was very, shall we say, comfortable with her body and as far as shoots go, I would say it was fun."
On Nov. 30, Emily tweeted that she initially wanted to stay silent to avoid giving Leder attention, but she had "had enough" and needed to speak out. "The book and the images within them are a violation," she wrote, adding that the photos were initially intended for an "artful magazine shoot" and she didn't give permission for them to be published in a book.
Perhaps by posting more selfies like the one above, Emily's hoping to diminish the value of the book. After all, why buy a book full of sexy Emily pictures when her feed has just the same, if not better, images for free?
Get non-boring fashion and beauty news directly in your feed. Follow
Follow Rachel on Twitter and Instagram.
"| Emily | Ratajkowski | Teases | Followers | With | Steamy | Lingerie | Selfie | Night | 🌙< | p> A | photo | posted | (@emrata) | 2016 | 8:43pm | PST< | p> < | div> < | blockquote> < | div> Advertisement | Continue | Reading | Below< | p> < | div> Emily | only | Insta | famous | models | there | didnt | walk | Victorias | Secret | Fashion | Show | this | year | that | stop | from | slipping | into | something | sexy | over | weekend | p> On | Sunday | decided | take | steamy | lingerie | selfie | post | Instagram | Night | 🌙 | wrote | alongside | sizzling | image | which | featured | white | lacy | bodysuit | Gooseberry | Intimates< | sheer | other | accessory: | pair | layered | delicate | gold | necklaces | p> But | more | picture | than | meets | Emilys | latest | comes | after | news | photographer | Jonathan | Leder | publishing | entire | collection | similar | shots< | book | form | According | York | Post< | Ratajkowski< | features | explicit | photos | taken | house | Woodstock | were | 2012 | before | career | took | shot | nights | Just | reportedly | writes | foreword | getting | even | creepier | very | shall | comfortable | with | body | shoots | would | tweeted | initially | wanted | stay | silent | avoid | giving | attention | enough | needed | speak | images | within | them | violation | adding | intended | artful | magazine | shoot | give | permission | published | p> Perhaps | posting | selfies | like | above | hoping | diminish | value | After | full | pictures | when | feed | just | same | better | free | p> Get | boring | fashion | beauty | directly | your | Follow< | Facebook | CosmoBeauty< | em>< | p> Follow | Rachel | Twitter< | Instagram< | strong>< | p> |
